<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scalar Subqueries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/</link>
	<description>Just another Oracle weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scalar Subselect Cost Accounting &#171; OraStory</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/#comment-44232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scalar Subselect Cost Accounting &#171; OraStory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/#comment-44232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Also see: http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also see: <a href="http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/" rel="nofollow">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardinality feedback &#171; Oracle Scratchpad</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/#comment-32957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardinality feedback &#171; Oracle Scratchpad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/#comment-32957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a very large partitioned table in that view, and you might notice it is referenced twice: once as a scalar subquery in the from clause &#8211; where a couple of &#8220;)&#8221; have turned into &#8220;&#124;&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a very large partitioned table in that view, and you might notice it is referenced twice: once as a scalar subquery in the from clause &#8211; where a couple of &#8220;)&#8221; have turned into &#8220;|&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andras Gabor</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/#comment-22573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andras Gabor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/scalar-subqueries/#comment-22573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

As far as I remember this is different in different Oracle versions. Before 9i these scalar subqueries were not shown in the plan at all. In 9i they are shown in the explain plan but are not visible in the v$sql_plan (I don&#039;t remember of v$sql_plan_statistics_all). In 10g it is shown everywhere correctly. However, this should be rechecked, but right now I only have access to some 10g systems. (similarly temp table transformation steps were not shown correctly in 9i, but are nice in 10g)

Also, If you have more subqueries in the select list they are listed after each other and the main query is the last child. 

Sorry for not being 100 pct sure though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>As far as I remember this is different in different Oracle versions. Before 9i these scalar subqueries were not shown in the plan at all. In 9i they are shown in the explain plan but are not visible in the v$sql_plan (I don&#8217;t remember of v$sql_plan_statistics_all). In 10g it is shown everywhere correctly. However, this should be rechecked, but right now I only have access to some 10g systems. (similarly temp table transformation steps were not shown correctly in 9i, but are nice in 10g)</p>
<p>Also, If you have more subqueries in the select list they are listed after each other and the main query is the last child. </p>
<p>Sorry for not being 100 pct sure though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
