<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Nulls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/</link>
	<description>Just another Oracle weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/#comment-37562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=4573#comment-37562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lascoltodelvenerdi,

The function-based index idea could be very useful here - especially if you use it to exclude the extremely popular values from the index (which, for the sake of argument, I&#039;ll assume is the Male / Female).  

An index on something like (case sex when &#039;Male&#039; then null when &#039;Female&#039; then null else sex end) - could be very helpful. 

And in some cases your previous thought about multiple function-based indexes (perhaps using 11g&#039;s option for virtual columns and indexes on virtual columns) would be more appropriate with definitions like: (case sex when &#039;Unknown&#039; then &#039;Unknown&#039; else null).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lascoltodelvenerdi,</p>
<p>The function-based index idea could be very useful here &#8211; especially if you use it to exclude the extremely popular values from the index (which, for the sake of argument, I&#8217;ll assume is the Male / Female).  </p>
<p>An index on something like (case sex when &#8216;Male&#8217; then null when &#8216;Female&#8217; then null else sex end) &#8211; could be very helpful. </p>
<p>And in some cases your previous thought about multiple function-based indexes (perhaps using 11g&#8217;s option for virtual columns and indexes on virtual columns) would be more appropriate with definitions like: (case sex when &#8216;Unknown&#8217; then &#8216;Unknown&#8217; else null).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lascoltodelvenerdi</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/#comment-37560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lascoltodelvenerdi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=4573#comment-37560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9! 9! We got 9 from the UK, no one say more? :)

Seriously, if we can not (or we want not) use bitmap indexes, I think that introduction of function based indexes can be of help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9! 9! We got 9 from the UK, no one say more? :)</p>
<p>Seriously, if we can not (or we want not) use bitmap indexes, I think that introduction of function based indexes can be of help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timur Akhmadeev</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/#comment-37557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timur Akhmadeev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=4573#comment-37557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/myth-bitmap-indexes-with-high-distinct-columns-blow-out/#comment-7286&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;9 in UK&lt;/a&gt;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/myth-bitmap-indexes-with-high-distinct-columns-blow-out/#comment-7286" rel="nofollow">9 in UK</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lascoltodelvenerdi</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/#comment-37550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lascoltodelvenerdi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=4573#comment-37550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uhm...5 genders...
5 function based indexes can be of help?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm&#8230;5 genders&#8230;<br />
5 function based indexes can be of help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uwe Hesse</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/good-nulls/#comment-37549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uwe Hesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=4573#comment-37549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to recommend the values &#039;M&#039; and NULL for gender columns - ok, maybe political incorrect - until some guy from a big agency told me that they have 5 genders to maintain :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to recommend the values &#8216;M&#8217; and NULL for gender columns &#8211; ok, maybe political incorrect &#8211; until some guy from a big agency told me that they have 5 genders to maintain :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
