<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cost &#8211; again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/cost-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/cost-again/</link>
	<description>Just another Oracle weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randolf Geist</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/cost-again/#comment-39248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randolf Geist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=2227#comment-39248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very valid point, and makes the whole point about &quot;comparing costs of the same / different query&quot; moot, in particular with the introduction of Cost Based Query Transformation (CBQT) in 10g - because since then the optimizer effectively compares costs of &quot;different&quot;, namely transformed, queries all the time (I assume this is what you intended to express with &quot;it will also be comparing costs of different queries&quot;).

It also gives an important clue why this improvement not always produces desirable results, simply because the cost estimates might be wrong for various reasons.

Randolf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very valid point, and makes the whole point about &#8220;comparing costs of the same / different query&#8221; moot, in particular with the introduction of Cost Based Query Transformation (CBQT) in 10g &#8211; because since then the optimizer effectively compares costs of &#8220;different&#8221;, namely transformed, queries all the time (I assume this is what you intended to express with &#8220;it will also be comparing costs of different queries&#8221;).</p>
<p>It also gives an important clue why this improvement not always produces desirable results, simply because the cost estimates might be wrong for various reasons.</p>
<p>Randolf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug's Oracle Blog</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/cost-again/#comment-39220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug's Oracle Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=2227#comment-39220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Cost...&lt;/strong&gt;

As soon as I saw the title of Jonathan Lewis&#039; post, I had an inkling of what it might have to say and I wasn&#039;t too far off the mark. Although I don&#039;t disagree with a single statement of his post (I&#039;ve read it a few times to make sure), I tend to ta...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cost&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As soon as I saw the title of Jonathan Lewis&#8217; post, I had an inkling of what it might have to say and I wasn&#8217;t too far off the mark. Although I don&#8217;t disagree with a single statement of his post (I&#8217;ve read it a few times to make sure), I tend to ta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
