<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: used_urec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/09/02/used_urec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/09/02/used_urec/</link>
	<description>Just another Oracle weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/09/02/used_urec/#comment-41612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=7085#comment-41612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good question - I&#039;d have to test it, but the first question is &quot;incease it relative to what?&quot;

Logically it shouldn&#039;t make any difference to (at least some of) the possible insert operations because undo and redo are logical change descriptions, so the physical location shouldn&#039;t make any difference.

There might be some cases where inserting a row causes heap block compression and introduces some new tokens (that&#039;s just thinking aloud, at the moment) and that would make that could make that row insert more expensive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question &#8211; I&#8217;d have to test it, but the first question is &#8220;incease it relative to what?&#8221;</p>
<p>Logically it shouldn&#8217;t make any difference to (at least some of) the possible insert operations because undo and redo are logical change descriptions, so the physical location shouldn&#8217;t make any difference.</p>
<p>There might be some cases where inserting a row causes heap block compression and introduces some new tokens (that&#8217;s just thinking aloud, at the moment) and that would make that could make that row insert more expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilton Businessman</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2011/09/02/used_urec/#comment-41611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilton Businessman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=7085#comment-41611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t the 11g &quot;compress for OLTP&quot; introduce increased UNDO too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the 11g &#8220;compress for OLTP&#8221; introduce increased UNDO too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
