<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/ssd-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/ssd-2/</link>
	<description>Just another Oracle weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/ssd-2/#comment-50647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?p=9607#comment-50647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not too surprised about Guy&#039;s conclusions about redo on SSD. 
This is not because I am expert on SSD (I can spell it) but because I attended a presentation a couple of years ago by a couple of engineers from LSI.
Their job was to do performance testing of the new LSI SSD product for Oracle Flashcache.
They were surprised to consistently find that redo performed better on spinning rust than on SSD.
After discussing it with some other engineers they had a better understanding of the limitations of SSD when used with redo.
The Powerpoint for that presentation is here: 
  http://www.oswoug.org/Slides/LSI/SolidStateStorageinOracleEnvironmentsv4.pptx

The most interesting redo bits aren&#039;t available in the presention, you had to be there.
There is mention however that due to sequential writes redo performs better on HDD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not too surprised about Guy&#8217;s conclusions about redo on SSD.<br />
This is not because I am expert on SSD (I can spell it) but because I attended a presentation a couple of years ago by a couple of engineers from LSI.<br />
Their job was to do performance testing of the new LSI SSD product for Oracle Flashcache.<br />
They were surprised to consistently find that redo performed better on spinning rust than on SSD.<br />
After discussing it with some other engineers they had a better understanding of the limitations of SSD when used with redo.<br />
The Powerpoint for that presentation is here:<br />
  <a href="http://www.oswoug.org/Slides/LSI/SolidStateStorageinOracleEnvironmentsv4.pptx" rel="nofollow">http://www.oswoug.org/Slides/LSI/SolidStateStorageinOracleEnvironmentsv4.pptx</a></p>
<p>The most interesting redo bits aren&#8217;t available in the presention, you had to be there.<br />
There is mention however that due to sequential writes redo performs better on HDD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
