Here’s a bit of geek stuff that I’ve been meaning to write up for nearly a year – to the day, more or less – and I’ve finally been prompted to finish the job off by the re-appearance on the OTN database forum of the standard “keep cache” question:
- Why isn’t Oracle keeping an object “properly” when it’s smaller than the db_keep_cache_size and it has been assigned to the buffer_pool keep ?
This is a two-part note – and in the first part I’m just going to run a query and talk about the results. The query is one that has to be run by SYS because it references a couple of x$ structures, and this particular version of the query was engineered specifically for a particular client.
select obj, state, bitand(bh.flag,power(2,13)) cur, count(*) ct from x$bh bh, x$kcbwds wds where wds.addr = bh.set_ds and wds.set_id between 1 and 24 group by obj, state, bitand(bh.flag,power(2,13)) order by obj, state, bitand(bh.flag,power(2,13)) ;
You’ll notice I’m joining x$bh (the “buffer header” array) to x$kcbwds (the “working data set” array) where I’ve picked sets 1 to 24. On this particular system these were the sets for the KEEP cache. (If you want a generic query to isolate a particular cache then there’s an example here that identifies the RECYCLE cache by reference – but I wanted the query in this note to run as efficiently as possible against this production system, so I did a preliminary lookup against x$kcbwbpd and then used the literal set ids).
Here are a few lines from the resulting output:
OBJ STATE CUR CT ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 40158 1 8192 1 40189 1 0 87233 8192 272789 3 0 69804 8192 393868 40192 1 0 87 8192 12197 3 0 30763 8192 1994 ... 117291 1 0 498 8192 4419 3 0 3001 8192 15 117294 1 0 243 8192 3544 3 0 1245 8192 23 4294967294 3 0 2 ********** ---------- sum 1216072
Since we’re looking at x$ structures – which rarely have any official documentation – the rest of this note isn’t guaranteed to be correct – and things do change with version so I need to stress that this specific example comes from 18.104.22.168. This is what I think the results show:
The state column is instance-related and is essentially something that’s useful in a RAC enviroment. State 1 translates to ‘XCUR’ (exclusive current) which means that this instance has exclusive rights to the most recent version of the block; state 3 translates to ‘CR’ (only valid for consistent read).
Bit 13 of the flag column is set if the buffer has been “gotten in current mode”. (If you’re interested in the other bits there’s a page on my old website that might keep you entertained for a while – I haven’t yet updated it to 11g, though.)
The problem for the client was this – the total size of all the data segments in the KEEP cache was about 6GB and the total size of the KEEP cache was about 10GB, yet the database was still reporting a constant trickle of physical reads to the objects and, when the code to “re-load” the cache was executed at a quiet period at the start of the day some 60,000 physical blocks had to be read. With a 10GB cache for 6GB of data would you really expect to see this I/O ?
Take a look at the figures for object 40189:
There are 272,789 buffers for blocks that were “gotten in current mode” (bit 13 is set) and are also “exclusive current” (state 1) to the instance, but there are also 393,868 buffers that were originally “gotten in current mode” but are now “only valid for consistent read”.
Similarly there are 87,233 buffers for blocks that weren’t “gotten in current mode” but are “exclusive current” to the instance – in other words they are the most up to date version of the block but weren’t fetched with a “db block get”, and again there are 69,804 buffers holding blocks that were not “gotten in current mode” but which are now “only valid for consistent read”.
Buffers that are “only valid for consistent read” are buffers holding blocks that have been generated through one of Oracle’s mechanisms for creating CR (consistent read) clones. As you can see, then, a block that is a CR clone may still be flagged as “gotten in current mode”. In fact, in line with Oracle’s generally “lazy” approach to work you can even find (in some versions of Oracle, at least) CR clones that still have the “dirty” bit set in the flag, even though CR clones can never really be dirty and are NEVER written to disc.
Take another look at the buffer counts – this KEEP cache is sized at 1.2M buffers (10GB), but object 40189 alone has taken out 460,000 of those buffers (3.6GB) in block clones, and for this object there are more clones than originals (at 360,000, which happens to be just a few thousand blocks less than the size of the table). So, when you’re thinking about creating a KEEP cache, remember that you have to allow for block cloning – simply setting the db_keep_cache_size to something “a bit bigger” than the object you want to keep cached may not even be close to adequate.
Part 2 to follow soon.